We’re on what I consider to be a disturbing trend in the legislative process. We are naming our laws.
There’s Megan’s Law (sex offender notification), Lottie’s Law (murder of the elderly), the Brooke Blanchard Law (death caused when struck by a teenage drunk driver) and most of us know about the Amber Alert (public notification in the case of a kidnapped child). According to MADD, the anti-drunk driving organization, more than 50 laws have been named for victims over the past few years. "The headstone of the 1990s (became) not a concrete marker, but a law," said psychologist Robert D. Butterworth.
Giving a law a name is also a way to give it a push through the legislative process. A lawmaker might not agree with the substance of a bill, but how could he or she be against honoring the victim of a (fill-in-the-blank with the crime of your choice)?
That’s one reason why the red light went on when it was announced that Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-Fairport (representing a portion of Niagara County), is supporting a drive to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine when it comes to radio and television broadcasting.
While it’s not named after a human being, it is named after a concept that Americans readily accept: It’s the notion of being tolerant and respectful of our fellow citizens. But putting that label on the so-called “Fairness Doctrine” is something else as well. It’s a lie.
A little history: The original Fairness Doctrine was a policy enforced by the Federal Communications Commission beginning in 1949. It required broadcasters to present balanced views when taking on controversial subjects. It made heavy use of the “equal opportunity” or equal time provision of the Communication Act of 1937.
But while fairness was the policy’s intent, its real-world impact was something quite different. In a study in the mid-1980s, the FCC found that the doctrine had a chilling effect on discussion and debate. Broadcasters were fearful that their licenses could be put in jeopardy if they ran afoul of the policy, so they avoided controversy at all. In the deregulatory spirit of the times and the effort to spur debate, President Ronald Reagan ordered the Fairness Doctrine off the FCC’s books in 1987.
Now some members of Congress, including Rep. Slaughter, want to go back to the bad old days of broadcasting, giving the Fairness Doctrine the force of law. It might better be called the “Let’s Lose Limbaugh Law.”
Ever since the conservative radio talk-show host and others like him have been skewering Democratic politicians and liberal-leaning thinkers, the left wing has been looking for a way to get rid of them. They couldn’t do it the good old American way, out-compete them. The liberals have tried but have failed miserably.
The latest push, the liberal-leaning Air America radio network, is barely alive, struggling its way out of bankruptcy protection. Whether its a case of having popular ideas or simply being better broadcasters than the liberals, Limbaugh and friends have thrived where the rest have not survived.
So, in the typical left wing way of doing things, if you can’t compete, try to destroy your opponents by legislating them out of existence. This would probably do it. Few radio or television station owners would dare carry controversial programming if it meant the government thought police threatening the core of their businesses: Their licenses to transmit over the airwaves.
The argument that the Fairness Doctrine gives everyone a say on the scarce broadcast spectrum no longer holds water. An expanded AM band, the explosive growth of FM and now satellite radio gives room for almost all viewpoints on the radio; the same goes for cable and satellite on television. We all have the freedom to choose what we want to listen to and watch and tune out what we’d rather ignore.
Take it from someone who has worked in broadcasting longer than Rep. Slaughter has been in Congress: Turning the Fairness Doctrine into law would be a mistake. There’s nothing fair about it.
Dick Lucinski is the managing editor of the Niagara Gazette. His columns appear on Wednesdays and Sundays.
Columns
Related Photos
LUCINSKI: Fairness Doctrine is unfair
- Columns
-
-
CITY BEAT: Can you hear us now Congress?
Feeling down? Depressed? Upset because another football season has ended?
Confused because people actually watch things like “The Bachelor” or “The Voice?” -
HIGGS: Ordinance changes in the city raise eyebrows
New local ordinances are in the pipeline, such as changes to the Landlord Registration Ordinance, (more on that later) and a couple of other issues taking shape.
-
GLYNN: It’s ‘D-Day’ all over for Wallenda
Nik Wallenda is still left with that up-in-the-air feeling about the chance to fulfill his dream.
-
PFEIFFER: Something that really 'bugs' me
Who would ever think that roaches, as in cockroaches, not your left-over weed, and valentines are a good match?
As the greatest Hallmark holiday ever created looms large, my friends at the Wildlife Conservation Society and the Bronx Zoo have concocted a Valentines Day fundraising promotion that just makes you want to say, “Really?” -
HAMILTON: The SPCA and the pineapple upside-down pie
It is said that, as free Americans, we often get the things for which we ask; we also often get exactly what we deserve. Sometimes it works out to our good, and sometimes it doesn’t.
-
GLYNN: Slim chance now for a real thick ice bridge
If you’re not convinced about the unpredictability of Western New York weather, consider that this area was experiencing temperatures in the mid-40s on the 100th anniversary of the ice bridge tragedy in the gorge.
-
BRADBERRY: Is Black History Month Still Relevant?
I am uncomfortably recovering and slowly recuperating from a relatively minor, but medically necessary procedure which has kept me out of circulation, out of touch and essentially on my back for a lot longer than I have personally believed was justifiable; however, in this case my opinion matters not; the doctor’s diagnosis and promising prognosis trumped mine, so here I lay almost completely befuddled, nearly unable to pen a clear sentence.
-
CONFER: Time to end the NFL’s blackout rule
Long ago, in a much simpler time, ticket sales accounted for the majority of revenues for professional football teams.
-
CITY BEAT: Stuck on traffic
Sometimes I feel like the traffic signal reporter in Niagara Falls.
Traffic signals have been making a lot of news around here lately. There’s the whole flap about what to do to improve public safety near the Como Restaurant in the 2200 block of Pine Avenue. -
HIGGS: Discussing crime and punishment in the Falls
Have to take a detour off Pine Avenue in 1956 this week to report on an event held by the Niagara Falls Block Club Council for its member clubs and other interested citizens.
- More Columns Headlines
-
Nordic Festival Puts North Korea in Spotlight
'Rumor Has It' Adele's Rolling in the Grammys
Grohl, Grammy Nominees Cut Up on the Red Carpet
Greece Passes New Austerity Deal Amid Rioting
Coroner: Houston Autopsy Results Weeks Away
Raw Video: Greek Rioting Ahead of Austerity Vote
Raw Video: Child Rescued After Kosovo Avalanche
Pop Music Superstar Whitney Houston Dies at 48
Whitney Houston's Church Mourns Her Passing
Reaction to Houston's Death at Clive Davis Party
79 Turtles Seized at Shanghai Airport
Severe Cold Wreaks Havoc in China
Fuel Removal Under Way on Capsized Italian Ship
Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room
Paul Suffers Narrow Loss to Romney in Maine
Palin Brings Anti-Washington Message to CPAC
Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate
Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords
Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama
Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag
