We’ve said it before. We’ll say it again. America loves lists.
We will list just about anything: Best ice cream flavors; worst songs of the rock and roll era; favorite overpriced coffee outlets; drunkest cities (there really is such a list: Denver is No. 1).
You see them on the covers of those magazines at the supermarket checkout: 35 best makeovers; 25 ways to lose 35 pounds; 15 unmentionable ways to treat the opposite sex. Lists, lists, lists.
A list put together by Reason magazine this month is of particular interest. Reason is a publication that advances the libertarian line of thinking: Not liberal, where the government or some other big brother tries to control every aspect of your life because, of course, they know best and you know nothing.
Libertarianism is the exact opposite. A libertarian is fiercely, some say radically, anti-government restrictions, anti-anyone trying to tell you what to do and how to run your life.
The list ranked the 35 largest metropolitan areas in the nation on restriction of personal freedoms. Given its point of view, Reason said the more restrictions, the worse the ranking. The magazine used the term “nanny-state” cities, communities that use a collective opinion on how you should run your life instead of letting you make those personal decisions.
Now Vegas, the least restrictive, is understandable. It doesn’t get the nickname “Sin City” for nothing. It’s a town where almost anything goes.
Chicago is kind of a surprise, but Reason cites a ban on serving alcohol at all-nude strip clubs, restrictive gun control laws, a public smoking ban and widespread use of surveillance cameras. It also notes that nearly a quarter of Chicago’s precincts are alcohol-free.
The point of all this is not for use as a tour guide (for a good time, go to Las Vegas). It goes deeper than that.
It points out the creeping interference of government into our everyday lives. And it shows how one restriction leads to another.
If you think gun control laws are good, that kind of intrusion of local government on your Second Amendment rights might not bother you too much. But, if you like the occasional glass of wine with dinner and the local government thinks it’s bad and says you can’t, then it’s a travesty.
The natural tendency of government is to “do something.” Politicians get reelected if they show how they changed things. Never mind that the changes are often meddling, intrusive and ill-advised. They “did something.” And to many of the gullible among us, that’s enough to vote for them in the next election.
So the next time an official says he or she “did something” about some perceived problem, take a closer look. Make sure that what he or she did didn’t simply make matters worse.
Here are the rankings, from most “nanny” to least:
35. Chicago
34. Seattle
33. New York
32. Boston
31. El Paso
30. San Diego
29. Nashville
28. Houston
27. Los Angeles
26. Charlotte
25. Philadelphia
24. Indianapolis
23. Memphis
22. Columbus
21. Washington, D.C.
20. San Francisco
19. Baltimore
18. San Jose
17. Dallas
16. Cleveland
15. Phoenix
14. Austin
13. San Antonio
12. Oakland
11. Ft. Worth
10. Detroit
9. Atlanta
8. Jacksonville
7. Portland
6. Milwaukee
5. Kansas City
4. Louisville
3. Denver
2. Miami
1. Las Vegas
Columns
LUCINSKI: Listing the nation’s ‘nanny’ cities
- Columns
-
-
HAMILTON: Dandelions, parades, broken poles and people
There are still those remnants of the fading bouquets of floral tributes that still hang at that base of a tree on city hall’s lawn. It is near where, last year, from his shiny silvery cart, Melvin Johnson sold hot dogs and sausages to both city employees and passerbys while his tiny white dog excitingly yelped at anyone that came near.
- No Headline Provided
-
GLYNN: Gillibrand seeks help for prime bread-winners
A recent report shows that working mothers across the Empire State earn nearly 15 percent lower pay for the same work as men.
-
BRADBERRY: There really are spirits in the water
Over the centuries since it was “discovered” hundreds of millions of people have traveled from every corner of the world to visit Niagara Falls making it the most visited of the great waterfalls on the planet.
-
CONFER: The reality of rationed health care
The ongoing debate over Obamacare has brought to light the concept of rationed healthcare. Opponents of health care reform keenly point out that while the bill never explicitly calls out rationing, it features certain provisions that will lead the markets to adjust to strict federal demands and, therefore, dispense certain procedures in smaller amounts or not at all. Because of it being the first time that the subject has really come up in public circles, most people, especially on the right, believe that rationing is something new. It’s not. The free markets have been practicing that for quite some time. I should know; with a 4-inch long, 1-inch wide scar running south of my belly button – and a couple of related scars around my groin – I could be the poster child for rationed health care.
-
CITY DESK: A regrettable error
We owe Carol Sensabough an apology.
Several weeks ago, the long-time reader and Niagara Falls resident sent a letter to the editor explaining that she took offense to some of the things written by a syndicated columnist, Stephen Dick. -
HIGGS: Niagara Falls' own West Side story
Trusello’s Bakery was on Elmwood behind the family home at 840 19th St. The family, Richard, William (Billy) and Sam along with two sisters, lived in the house.
-
GLYNN: Falls, Ont., rolls out red carpet for Wallenda
Before Nik Wallenda even started practicing his high-wire routine in downtown Niagara Falls, state Sen.George D. Maziarz, R-Newfane, had noted the warm welcome the tightrope walker received across the river.
-
HAMILTON: Civic ‘ParticipAction’ can work too
Back in the 1970s, our Neighbors to the North ran a national campaign called ParticipAction to encourage Canadians to get off their butts and do things for the sakes of their bodies.
-
GLYNN: Graduates find they’re in staggering debt
Countless senior citizens often gripe about something, sometimes even with good reason. Perhaps they should consider themselves fortunate, compared with the younger generation.
- More Columns Headlines
-


