You recently editorialized about an earlier piece written by Frank Parlato concerning the inequality between Indian-owned and operated businesses and those non-Indian businesses trying to compete.
In your editorial, you posed questions about how this unfair advantage enjoyed by Indian tribal businesses could be remedied. The solution to this problem was directly addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1998 case titled “Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma vs. Manufacturing Technologies Inc. (523 U.S. 721).
In that case, a unanimous nine-judge court concluded that the court-created doctrine of legal and tax immunity for Indian tribes was created in a 1921 case for entirely different purposes and to protect small, dependent and nascent Indian tribes.
The justices reasoned that in this day and age, when Indian tribes and tribal governments own and operate huge business empires and huge and varied multi-million dollar corporate holdings, that application of this immunity doctrine in such cases, was clearly an improper anachronism.
In the end, however, six of the nine justices of the court opined that the problem these court cases created by allowing Indian tribal immunity to e extended to these business enterprises, should be fixed by Congress.
Justice Stevens, writing for the three judge minority, put it succinctly saying: “Why should an Indian tribe have greater immunity than the United States, all the several states and every foreign sovereign nation?”
The court did not stop at that point, however, and they suggested a simple solution to Congress in order to eliminate this unfair business largesse’. They suggested that Congress amend the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act to include Indian tribes and their business enterprises. That federal law provides that any foreign sovereign nation like France, England, Japan or Costa Rica, who did business in this country, with this country or with any citizen of this country, is obligated to obey all federal, state and local laws, pay all the same taxes and is amenable to be sued in all the courts of the land for their misdeeds just like every other domestic busines.
That case was decided 10 years ago, and Congress has done nothing.
There are two primary reasons for this. First, it has been politically incorrect to curb any activities of Indian tribes, even when their true identity is suspect or they are nothing but a front for other non-Indian busines empires.
The second reason is that the vast sums of money available through gambling casinos and resulting from legal and tax-immunized businesses, allow cotributions to be made to Congressmen and senators, lobbyists and their ilk, invitably has prevented any ovement in Congress to fix this incredibly unfair advantage.
It cannot be overlooked in this contet that the landmark McCain/Feingold federal campaign reform, reporting and Contribution Limitation Act conspicuously omits any limitation on Indian tribal contributins to politicians, thus ensuring that nothing is likey to be done to limit tribal business exploitation of this outdated sovereign immunity doctrine to the detriment of other non-Indian businesses.
James E. Marino is an attorney in Santa Barbara, Calif.
Columns
GUEST VIEW: Congress is key to business equality in Falls
- Columns
-
-
CONFER: Time to end the NFL’s blackout rule
Long ago, in a much simpler time, ticket sales accounted for the majority of revenues for professional football teams.
-
CITY BEAT: Stuck on traffic
Sometimes I feel like the traffic signal reporter in Niagara Falls.
Traffic signals have been making a lot of news around here lately. There’s the whole flap about what to do to improve public safety near the Como Restaurant in the 2200 block of Pine Avenue. -
HIGGS: Discussing crime and punishment in the Falls
Have to take a detour off Pine Avenue in 1956 this week to report on an event held by the Niagara Falls Block Club Council for its member clubs and other interested citizens.
-
GLYNN: Hotel Niagara plan exciting for the Falls
It all sounds like a re-run of a TV program you’ve seen a dozen times. This time, however, there is every reason to believe that the landmark Hotel Niagara on Rainbow Boulevard will be restored to the splendid atmosphere that guests enjoyed for decades.
-
HAMILTON: BOE and kids, or the SPCA dogs?
There is example after example of otherwise qualified Niagara Falls’ board of education members and staffers lending their time and efforts to organizations outside of the school district’s core business.
-
GLYNN: Trust in SPCA shelter must be restored
Stories about the operations at the Niagara SPCA shelter shape the image of sickening and disgusting treatment of animals.
-
BRADBERRY: Old medicine and new challenges
Having suffered and recovered from my fair share of illnesses and injuries over the years, I have come to believe that sometimes the treatment and the cure of my condition can seem to be far worse than whatever I may think is ailing me at the moment.
-
CONFER: Federal spending derailed by Amtrak
We’ve been inundated with news reports about the fiscal woes of the U.S. Postal Service. Why is it that we never hear anything about another federal enterprise facing ongoing losses -- Amtrak?
-
CITY BEAT: Worthwhile change is never easy
When I was a much younger and thinner reporter, I got a call one day from a particularly irate gentleman who asked me “if my newspaper knew what it was doing?”
-
HIGGS: Family stories and a slow start to the 1800 block
I heard from a couple of my readers who added a few tidbits that I did not know about their families.
- More Columns Headlines
-






