I like the Gazette, and I often like David Arkin’s work, but I think you’re missing the point in (Friday’s) discussion of the Washington Redskins. “Redskin” is a pejorative, unlike the more neutral “Indian” or the more positive “Braves” or “Chiefs.” The Redskin nickname seems to me to be a direct reminder to Native Americans of a tragically genocidal time in North American history when they were referred to with these kinds of terms shortly before they were slaughtered, and so the nickname is a slap in the face. I would recommend you read Dee Brown’s “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee” for an authoritative view of that unhappy period in our shared past.
As a long-time journalism professor and writer, I should point out that the AP Stylebook finds a number of disparaging Native American terms troublesome and warns against their use. Also, the NCAA’s current struggle with the nickname issue at the college level is, at least, an indication that the problem is a lively one and needs to be thought through seriously rather than dismissed out-of-hand. You might serve your readers better by considering their opinion on the matter, and some significant part of your readership, I suspect, has Native American blood in its veins. Why offend your readers needlessly by defending the use of an obvious slur? I can see some defense for the use of an honorific (as in Braves) or a tribal name used with permission (as in Seminoles). But it’s hard to find ways to defend such a blatantly derogatory term as Redskins. Note the reference to the American Heritage dictionary meaning of “redskin,” which makes my point perfectly well, as does a quick glance at Dictionary.com (Offensive Slang: Used as a disparaging term for a Native American).
Chad Smith, principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, which is the second largest Indian tribe in America behind the Navajo Nation, offered these comments to me: Portraying Native American people as mascots relegates us to second-class citizenship. Mascots are for entertainment. They are fun. They are objects of ridicule for the opposition. And they are told to leave the field of play when the main event, the game, begins. No one would tolerate such treatment of African-Americans or Hispanics. Those ethnic groups are not subjected to the ‘honor’ of being mascots. Even here in Oklahoma, where Native Americans make up the largest minority group in the state, we have mascots that sport war paint and are called the Redskins.
The American Heritage Dictionary definition of “redskin” is the same as the definition for “the n-word,” which newspapers avoid printing and broadcasters avoid saying. Yet those same broadcasters and writers will use the term “redskin” without a second thought. The slap in the face is just as real, but verbally assaulting Indians, as opposed to other ethnic groups, is apparently not taboo in the media. Indian mascots instill into mainstream society stereotypical, offensive and factually incorrect notions of what Native Americans were and are.
Rick Wilber is a professor at the School of Mass Communications, University of South Florida.
Letters
A case for removing ‘Redskin’
- Letters
-
-
LETTER: Fighting the vile lies in Niagara Falls politics
I am sorry to have to write this letter. However, lies, distortions, and vile falsehoods cannot go unchallenged. So I feel compelled to fight back against the most recent lie — the completely false accusations that the Niagara Falls Democratic Committee and I are racist.
- GUEST VIEW: Elected officials need to learn about Islam
-
GUEST VIEW: Questions concerning Accardo’s announcement
The recent announcement by former Niagara Falls councilman John Accardo to run for the New York State Assembly is striking on at least two fronts.
-
LETTER: Setting record straight on Youngstown Presbyterian Church
I find myself so enraged by an article in the April 28 issue of a tabloid I prefer not to name that I must set straight one of the false accusations contained in it.
-
LETTER: Food pantries need support this Saturday
The Niagara Falls area has always been known for its generosity to those in need.
-
Pride and Jayne Park in LaSalle
City council president Sam Fruscione’s recent comments to the Niagara Gazette are ridiculous and filled with half-truths.
- LETTER: Erie County SPCA has facts wrong I am writing in response to recent statements made by Gina Browning, Erie County SPCA director of public relations. She recently stated: “When no assistance was provided by the Rainbow Animal Shelter regarding the Niagara County incident (the Rainbow Animal Shelter is the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Niagara County), SPCA serving Erie County representatives arrived at the Amherst Animal Emergency Clinic Saturday to assist.”
- LETTER: City heading up the creek Two weeks ago at a City Council meeting Cayuga Island residents expressed fear that a city plan would damage or even destroy Jayne Park.
- LETTERS: Rough roads tell tale of Falls This letter is in response to the rumor that Mayor Paul Dyster plans to run for Congresswoman Louise Slaughter’s congressional seat. He has not done anything to show that he is worthy of Slaughter’s congressional seat. He can’t even oversee his Public Works’ division, as evidenced by the deplorable condition and the job not done on our roads.
- LETTER: There’s no ‘we’ in restored I am responding to a letter March 29 regarding the issue as to what to do about the Robert Moses Parkway.
- More Letters Headlines
-
LETTER: Fighting the vile lies in Niagara Falls politics






