Niagara Gazette

Local News

June 9, 2008

LAKE ONTARIO: Water levels topic of meeting today

International Joint Commission to hear lake level concerns today

NEWFANE— Shoreline property owners on Lake Ontario are preparing to buck an environmental plan on a new strategy to regulate the levels of Lake Ontario. They’ll make their case at a public hearing today at 7 p.m. at the Olcott Fire Hall.

Two members of the International Joint Commission will conduct the meeting to discuss a $20 million study that was conducted over the past five years. Its purpose was to see if a better plan could be developed. Three plans have been proposed to replace the current Plan 1958.

Tony McKenna, a member of the plan’s Public Interest Advisory Committee, said environmentalists are pushing for Plan B-plus, which would to stretch the current range of water levels. That is, the deepest Great Lake would get higher highs and lower lows.

A study that concluded Plan B-plus would protect the wetlands has not been backed up.

Plan B-plus would adversely affect the shoreline, which has been eroded over the years, according to McKenna. Property owners say they are paying taxes on land that is now under water. While water levels on the other Great Lakes are going down, Lake Ontario is going up.

“I used to have beach. Now I get the beach about two weeks after Labor Day,” said Herb Linderman, who has 150 feet of lakeshore property on Somerset Drive in Somerset. “In a two-week period, all of a sudden I get a beach and what good is it then. I am not at all happy with them.

Homeowners who seek to protect their property have to get a joint permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Army Corps of Engineers.

“It’s a very difficult process to get something through in a timely manner,” McKenna said. “The DEC is not trying to help you out. They are trying to protect the environment. It’s a very difficult process. It’s very expensive and hard to find somebody to do it.”

Work can only be done in the fall, when the water level is lowest.

According to McKenna, it was the intent of the Joint Commission to find a plan that would improve the way the system works without harming any one of the stakeholders: Power, shipping, municipal water uses, shoreline property owners, recreational boaters and the environmentalists.

The most effected areas are along the South shore of Lake Ontario in Niagara, Orleans, Wayne and Monroe counties. The IJC has come out with an alternative plan — Plan 2007 — which has a relief process. However, that relief process does not come into effect until the water levels are even higher than under the 1958 plan.

“It appears that the IJC intends to implement Plan 2007 — which is the good news,” McKenna said. “But, they want to allow for a switch to Plan B-plus as soon as possible.”

He wants to unite the property owners against Plan B-plus.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium 50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station Calif.'s Coronado Named Nation's Best Beach CEO Salaries Become Sore Issue in Labor Disputes Raw Video: Fight Erupts in Ukrainian Parliament Texan Ranchers Remain Wary of Drought Raw Video: Soldiers Plant Flags at Arlington Police: Man Arrested in Etan Patz Disappearance NYC Protests: the Revolution Will Be Scripted Chicago U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald Resigns Neighbors of Etan Patz's Suspect: It's Shocking Gulf Fishermen Reel From Seafood Troubles Stuntman Makes Skydive Without Parachute in UK Raw Video: Bride Who Faked Cancer Released
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results