Niagara Gazette

Local News

July 2, 2009

CWM: DEC greenlights landfill cap

Agency approves controversial permit change

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has granted final approval to a permit modification that would allow CWM Chemical Services to install a controversial new cap on its Town of Porter landfill.

Maureen Wren, a spokesperson for the DEC, said her agency formally approved CWM’s request for a permit change on Thursday, clearing the way for the company to install a new cap on the RMU-1, a portion of the landfill where hazardous waste is still accepted.

CWM is looking to replace 2 feet of compacted clay layer with a new geosynthetic clay liner that the company says will provide greater resistance to weather conditions.

In issuing its negative declaration on the project’s environmental impact, the DEC found the new cap would reduce the overall thickness of the landfill cover, thus allowing for an estimated capacity increase of 3 percent. The DEC also determined the move would result in up to one year of additional landfill operation for the company.

Wren said the agency agreed to support the modification despite objections from many residents who spoke out during public hearings on the issue because the agency determined the alliterative design offers better protection for the site long term.

“This is not a change in the footprint or the height and it is using a more environmentally protective layer that, over time, will be superior to protecting the integrity of the cap,” Wren said.

CWM spokesperson Lori Caso welcomed the DEC’s decision.

“The DEC approved the modification because it is a technically superior cover design and it’s the environmentally responsible thing to do,” Caso said.

Critics argue that allowing the thinner cap to be installed is a violation of existing state law covering the expansion of capacity at hazardous waste landfills in New York.

The citizens’ group, Residents for Responsible Government, maintains the new cap will allow roughly 160,000 tons of additional waste to flow through Niagara County.

“The permit is not about a cap redesign,” said Lewiston resident and frequent CWM critic Amy Witryol. “Its about making money for CWM.”

Witryol described the DEC’s decision to approve the permit change as “irrelevant” and a “non-event” because the matter is still in litigation.

“It’s an official act, but as a practical matter, it doesn’t mean much,” Witryol said.

Niagara County and RRG filed suit against the DEC in an attempt to reverse the agency’s decision to grant tentative approval for the permit modification several months ago. Both groups argue that the agency lacks the legal capacity to approve such an expansion because state law prohibits increases in hazardous waste capacity absent the formal adoption of a statewide siting plan for such facilities. The state’s siting plan remains under review.

The DEC has argued that CWM’s request does not fall under the state’s siting laws because it does not allow for an increase in the landfill’s “currently permitted overall area or height” and will not “increase the rate” at which the site can accept waste.

A judge in State Supreme Court in Albany County sided with the DEC and CWM and the matter is now heading to an appeals court.

“It’s still in litigation,” Witryol said. “There is no final ruling.”

Caso declined comment on the ongoing litigation.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Raw Video: Activists Allege Massacre in Syria NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium 50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station Calif.'s Coronado Named Nation's Best Beach CEO Salaries Become Sore Issue in Labor Disputes Raw Video: Fight Erupts in Ukrainian Parliament Texan Ranchers Remain Wary of Drought Raw Video: Soldiers Plant Flags at Arlington Police: Man Arrested in Etan Patz Disappearance NYC Protests: the Revolution Will Be Scripted Chicago U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald Resigns Neighbors of Etan Patz's Suspect: It's Shocking Gulf Fishermen Reel From Seafood Troubles Stuntman Makes Skydive Without Parachute in UK
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results