Niagara Gazette

Local News

February 5, 2010

NIAGARA FALLS: Water plan dries up

North Tonawanda Water Superintendent Paul Drof will not be splitting his time with the City of Niagara Falls in a bid to divide his expertise — and his salary — between both cities.

Common Council President Catherine Schwandt issued a statement Friday saying she and Mayor Rob Ortt decided Drof is worth more to residents in the Lumber City by staying right where he is, despite a potential for cost savings under the plan.

The Niagara Falls Water Board’s bid to pay part of Drof’s salary in return for part of his time will benefit his current employer less than it would those in Niagara Falls, the statement concludes.

Drof recently had emerged as the leading candidate for consolidated oversight when the board began searching for a person to oversee operations in both cities.

“Due to the age and condition of water systems in Niagara Falls, there are real concerns here in North Tonawanda that our city’s employee would have been devoting the bulk of his time to another municipality, and little of his attention to our water customers,” Schwandt wrote.

“I was open to the idea of reviewing it,” Ortt said Friday. “I think we’re at a point where if there’s a potential for saving taxpayers money you have to look at it ... but when you consider Paul would be working half the hours in North Tonawanda, is it a savings or are you just getting less productivity?

Ortt said once planners got down to brass tacks the half and half time sharing started to look like less than that for his city, mainly because of the ailing infrastructure in Niagara Falls, which it seems would certainly demand more of Drof’s attention.

As for where that leave the city’s involvement in future shared services arrangements, Ortt said results of the Tri-City water study, funded using grant money more than a year ago, soon will be released.

“I felt it would be prudent to see what that report says before entering into something like this ...,” he said. “I’m hopeful that there will be something positive to come out of that but at this point there were more concerns and the collective decision was to not pursue this option.”

Drof could not be reached to comment Friday, though Ortt said he was made aware of the decision prior to the announcement.

Contact reporter Neale Gulley

at 693-1000, ext. 114.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
House Ads
AP Video
Pop Music Superstar Whitney Houston Dies at 48 Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Paul Suffers Narrow Loss to Romney in Maine Recording Superstar Whitney Houston Dead at 48 Maine GOP Chairman Says Romney Wins Caucuses Palin Brings Anti-Washington Message to CPAC Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion' 5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La. Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal $25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Opinion
House Ads
Night & Day
Twitter News
Follow us on twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
Front page
Poll

Do you think cigarette sales to non-Native American customers should be taxed on reservations?

Yes. Items should be taxed like they are everywhere else.
No, the indian reservations are sovereign land and they are selling them on their land.
Not up to me. Native Americans decide the rules on their land.
Don't care. Smoking isn't good for you.
     View Results